The basics of what make cars so useful and inherently easy to use have been retained, and it’s why EVs will succeed. Nor is it demanding that roads should be designed in an entirely different way. We shouldn’t think of the iPad as a traditional computer – I get that, too.īut the march of electric vehicles (EVs) isn’t being hampered by some new-fangled way of driving. The iPad is a completely new computing paradigm – I get that. It needs to break free of its iPhone heritage. And the same goes for pro app support until iPadOS feels a little bit more like my Mac, I fear that the likes of Final Cut Pro and Logic Pro will be far too fiddly, or, worse, pared-down, to be even remotely useful. If the iPad was a little more computer-like, this problem wouldn’t exist. Invariably, I always return to the Mac to complete the task. Whenever I encounter the need to work with individual files on iPadOS – be it the simple process of locating and copying files from one destination to another or something more complex – it feels almost impenetrable. But I can’t imagine either of them being much fun within the constraints of iPadOS 15.įile management is a case in point. But Apple needs to lead the charge, and that has to start with the aforementioned changes I’ve suggested for iPadOS.įor me, pro apps include Final Cut Pro and Logic Pro. Isn’t this up to the developers to provide us with those pro apps? Of course it is. Why not remove all of the hamfistedness that comes from trying to shoehorn traditional OS features into a modern touch-based OS? Stepping backwards, as Apple has proved with the new MacBook Pro, counts as progress, too.Īs for pro app support, I understand entirely if you’re scratching your head. Similarly, split-screen and slide-over for multitasking isn’t badly implemented on iPadOS, but why not make properly windowed apps a thing instead? Let us move them freely around the screen and arrange several apps (yes, more than three) however we wish? What’s to stop Apple from creating a desktop for the iPad? It wouldn’t have to look like the one with which we’re so familiar in macOS, either – it could be reimagined, built for touch, and intended entirely for the iPad’s lush expanse of screen estate. And widgets aren’t enough we need an operating system that makes use of that screen, and which borrows more heavily from macOS. It’s time to wave goodbye to springboard on iPadOS. I still believe that placing an M1 chip in the iPad Pro was an utter waste of time during a year that saw no meaningful changes to iPadOS, nor the emergence of Apple’s pro apps for the device. What I want is an operating system that harnesses the power of the iPad and provides the tools, hooks, and APIs necessary to enable truly professional applications to run on these devices. In fact, they have done so for years. But benchmarks bore me to tears. From the iPad mini to the 12.9” iPad Pro, these tablets absolutely smash the competition in benchmarks. Beyond the lack of customisation for larger screens, it barely touches the power that is nestled within every new iPad. Most notably, the new iPad mini features a home screen that inexplicably fails to span the width of the device.īut iPadOS has far deeper problems. The available screen estate isn’t best used on any of the iPads in this regard. The home screen (despite being recently granted access to larger widgets) looks like the home screen on the iPhone. IPadOS 15 still makes the iPad look like a big iPhone. Friends and family mocked me, understandably, for buying what essentially looked like a big iPhone. I was an early adopter – I bought the first iPad almost as soon as it hit the shelves back in 2010. It still doesn’t take advantage of the iPad. Indeed, there are a number of updates that have made it an increasingly useful operating system within my business. A troubled birth (that’s still taking place)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |